Skip to Content

Federal Court Rules Against SSA for NotProviding Accessible Formats to Blind Beneficiaries

April 28, 2008 • Darrell Shandrow Hilliker
For more information, contact:
Julia Epstein, Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund, (510) 644-2555 (x. 241) jepstein@dredf.org

Wondie Russell, Heller Ehrman LLP, (415) 772-6294, wondie.russell@hellerehrman.com Ron Milliman, American Council of the Blind, rmilliman@insightbb.com

JUDGE RULES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION MUST ACCOMMODATE BLIND BENEFICIARIES

San Francisco, CA – April 24, 2008 On Wednesday, April 23, 2008, Judge William Alsup of the US District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that the US Social Security Administration (SSA) must accommodate the real and legitimate needs of people with visual impairments who receive benefits from SSA.  The agency is required under the Rehabilitation Act and the due process clause, the ruling states, to provide communications in formats that are accessible to these beneficiaries.

The ruling came after SSA sought to dismiss a class action filed in federal court in 2005 by the American Council of the Blind and a group of individuals who are blind or have visual impairments filed a class action lawsuit against SSA, alleging that the agency fails to provide the most basic accommodations to its blind and visually impaired applicants and beneficiaries.  To this day, the SSA communicates with blind and visually impaired applicants and beneficiaries in standard 12 point font print that  they cannot read, and is unwilling to provide meaningful communication in alternative formats such as Braille, audio, large font or electronic text.

“In the 21st century there is no reasonable explanation or excuse for the SSA to continue to ignore the needs and rights of the blind population,  and we are committed to bringing about the necessary changes,” explained Wondie Russell of Heller Ehrman LLP, an attorney for plaintiffs.  “This decision has now set us on the path to securing reasonable accommodations.”

Plaintiff attorneys argued successfully that the agency is subject to the jurisdiction of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which requires bars discrimination on the basis of disability in federal programs, including removing communication barriers by providing “auxiliary aids” that allow persons with disabilities an equal opportunity to participate.  “The callousness of SSA’s adamant insistence that sending notices that our clients cannot read was not lost on the judge,” said Arlene Mayerson, Directing Attorney for Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF), and an attorney for plaintiffs.  “It is amazing that something that is clear to anyone, that sending a standard print notice to a blind individual denies due process, would end up in federal court.”

Mitch Pomerantz, American Council of the Blind President, stated: “It is long past time that the Social Security Administration – which assists tens of thousands of blind and visually impaired persons – is held to account for its stubborn unwillingness to adhere to a statute that is 35 years old.

There is no excuse in this day and age of easy access to printers with the capability for producing large type, and braille printers for SSA to violate the Rehabilitation Act and I applaud this ruling.”

Plaintiffs in the lawsuit have gone without benefits as a result of SSA’s failure to give them effective notice of its actions.  “Imagine receiving a phone call from the bank that your checks are bouncing and fees are mounting,” suggests American Council of the Blind Executive Director Melanie Brunson.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs include the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, Heller Ehrman LLP, the Oregon Advocacy Center, and the National Senior Citizens Law Center.

The American Council of the Blind is the nation’s leading consumer based advocacy organization working on behalf of blind and visually impaired Americans and has more than 70 state and special-interest affiliates throughout the United States. The national office of the organization is located in Washington, D.C. For more information about the ACB, visit the web site at http://www.acb.org .

Founded in 1979 by people with disabilities and parents of children with disabilities, the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF) is a national law and policy center dedicated to protecting and advancing the civil rights of people with disabilities through legislation, litigation, advocacy, technical assistance, and education and training of attorneys, advocates, persons with disabilities, and parents of children with disabilities.  For more information, go to www.dredf.org.

 Heller Ehrman LLP has more than 605 attorneys and professionals in 14 offices worldwide.  Heller Ehrman is committed to a multidisciplinary approach to the practice of law, drawing upon legal, scientific and industry knowledge from across the firm to build the best legal teams for both corporate and pro bono clients.  The firm’s core values are Excellence, People, Teamwork, Innovation, Community and One Firm. For many years, Heller Ehrman has been ranked among top firms in the nation for  commitment to pro bono legal service by The American Lawyer and others.
www.hellerehrman.com

 The National Senior Citizens Law Center advocates nationwide to promote  The independence and well-being of low-income elderly individuals and persons  with disabilities.  NSCLC provides technical assistance and training to attorneys and other advocates and is active in litigation and policy advocacy with a strong focus on income security and health care. For more information, go to the organization’s website at  www.nsclc.org.

 The Oregon Advocacy Center (OAC) is an independent non-profit organization  which provides legal advocacy services for people with disabilities anywhere in Oregon.  OAC is designated under federal law as the protection and advocacy system for Oregon, but it is not a part of the state or federal government. OAC has attorneys and advocates who assist people with disabilities. For more information, go to  www.oradvocacy.org .
Categories: Uncategorized

One opinion on “Federal Court Rules Against SSA for NotProviding Accessible Formats to Blind Beneficiaries

  1. This extremely important decision has a positive, far-reaching impact for not only blind and partially sighted individuals, but also for the marketplace at large. As the population ages, it is reasonable to expect that the group of older individuals who are blind or have low vision will grow. Since baby boomers are likely to seek disability benefits in greater numbers than previous generations, providing the public with the means to communicate effectively will ensure that consumers are better able to make informed decisions. This decision has the potential to revitalize the SSA by ensuring that the service delivery channels are fully accessible, and challenges mainstream service providers to develop solutions which lead to improved consumer options and choice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.